By carbon 14 dating Free sex chat live no sign up no hassle
But the more important point is this: The Shroud of Turin is not and never was a "work of art" in the conventional sense of that term.And in fact, were it in any way to look like a work of art-something made by human hands-this would imme-diately disqualify it from being what it is supposed to be: an acheiropoietos.And these, unlike icons, can only be one of a kind. It was manufactured at a time, in western Europe especially, when relics meant pilgrimage and pilgrimage meant money.
D., no one has been able to account for the shadowy image of a naked 6-foot-tall man that appears on the shroud.
Guillermo Gonzalez for sending me the issue of BAR with the Shroud article last November and encouraging me to act on it.
Stephen Mattingly - Previously unpublished response to the article "A Letter to Hershel Shanks, Editor of BAR" by Dr.
But in fact, it is simply historical ignorance of what the shroud really is (or at least, what it pur-ports to be) that leads these people to wrongheaded notions.
The Shroud of Turin is not, by definition, a work of art but instead belongs to the long and revered tradition of sacred objects that are at once relics and icons.
Search for by carbon 14 dating:
The single salient quality that these sacred objects share is that very quality that is so striking about the shroud-namely, a faint and elusive image seemingly pro-duced by bodily secretions.